Skip to content
HomeTechOps

Cameras

PoE budget calculator

Check whether one switch can power all your cameras using delivered watts and the total PoE budget, with the 80% rule and headroom for IR and heater spikes.

Use this before buying a PoE switch to confirm its total power budget covers your cameras' real draw — including PTZ/IR/heater spikes and cable loss — with safe headroom.

Low priority

Within budget — about 6 W headroom

6 cameras draw ~46 W (with 10% cable loss). Loading a 65 W switch to a safe 80% gives ~52 W usable, so this setup is within budget.

Total camera draw
46 W

incl. 10% cable loss

Usable switch budget
52 W

80% of the switch's total PoE budget

Headroom
6 W
Verdict
Within budget

First checks

  • Standard cameras: 6 × 7 W. High-draw (PTZ/IR/heater): 0 × 15 W.
  • Switch total PoE budget entered: 65 W (use the figure from the switch datasheet, not port count × class).
  • Enter each camera's rated max PoE power from its datasheet — IR and heaters change draw a lot.

Step-by-step troubleshooting

  1. 1

    Get the real per-camera wattage

    Read each camera's rated max PoE power from its datasheet (note PoE class).

    Expected: Accurate per-camera draw, including IR/heater modes.

    Next: Enter standard vs high-draw counts and watts above, then re-run.

  2. 2

    Size on delivered power and 80% loading

    Compare total draw to 80% of the switch's total PoE budget.

    Expected: Usable budget exceeds total draw with headroom.

    Next: If not, split across switches/injectors or pick a bigger budget.

What your answers suggest

  • Total draw = (std + high-draw) × watts × (1 + cable loss) = 46 W.
  • Usable budget = switch budget × 0.8 = 52 W.

Likely cause area

  • The switch's TOTAL PoE budget is the binding limit, not the per-port class — a switch can have many 30 W ports but a small total budget.
  • Size on delivered power (PD), not the source rating: 802.3af delivers ~12.95 W, 802.3at ~25.5 W, 802.3bt Type 3/4 ~51/71 W.

Safe actions

  • You're within the 80% loading guideline — leave the headroom for cold-start inrush and future cameras.
  • Verify long cable runs separately; voltage drop near 100 m reduces delivered power.

When to stop

  • Don't load a PoE switch past ~80% of its total budget — inrush and IR/heater spikes need headroom.

Assumptions

  • Per-camera wattage varies by model and IR/heater state — these are your entered values, not a per-model database.
  • Cable loss is approximated by the derate %; actual loss depends on run length and cable gauge.
  • PoE delivered power is always below the port's source rating.

Was this result useful?

Your answer helps us improve this page.

No account or personal details. We store the page, answer, optional reason and day with a 90-day retention period. A random reference in this browser prevents repeat votes. Feedback privacy

What should I check first?

  • Get each camera's rated max PoE power from its datasheet (note the PoE class).
  • Find the switch's TOTAL PoE budget in watts — not just the per-port class.
  • Separate standard fixed cameras from high-draw PTZ/IR/heated cameras.

What is likely wrong?

  • Assuming port count × class is the limit — the switch's total budget is the real ceiling.
  • Sizing on the source rating (15.4W/30W) instead of delivered power (~12.95W/25.5W).
  • Loading the switch to 100% with no headroom for cold-start inrush.

What is safe to try?

  • Keep total draw under ~80% of the switch's PoE budget.
  • Move PTZ/heated cameras to a higher-class port or a second switch/injector.
  • Account for long cable runs — delivered power drops near 100m.

When should I stop?

  • Stop before relying on a switch loaded past 80% — IR/heater spikes can trip the budget and drop cameras.
  • Stop before guessing wattage; use the camera datasheet, since IR and heaters change draw a lot.

Source-backed checks

HomeTechOps turns official docs and conservative safety rules into a shorter runbook. These links are the source trail for the page direction.